THIS BLOG IS FOR SALE, along with hundreds of other of my online newspapers and publications. My life is focused on my church, my spiritual and healing work. I am selling individual blogs (online magazine publications), all blogs, individually to the highest bidder. If you Like one of my online magazines, my publications, my intellectual property, and want to make me an offer, email me at . This FOR Sale posted by Reverend Crystal Cox, Bringing Back Goddess Church.

Also Note, if you wish to hire me to do any online marketing or investigative blogging work use that same email.

Wednesday, November 14, 2012

Who is Andrew Hill? Is Andrew Hill Marc Randazza? Have a Marc Randazza Tip, eMail me Crystal Cox Sworn ENEMY of Marc Randazza. Is Kenneth P. White involved in Extortion Scandals with Marc Randazza or with Andrew Hill. Please eMail documents, videos, transcripts, any evidence of Criminal Activity regarding Marc Randazza and Kenneth P. White.

Is Andrew Hill  Marc Randazza?  Who is Andrew Hill, more Coming Soon.

Beware of Kenneth P. White, Do your Homework

Kenneth White scandal with complaints of Andrew Hill

12/26/2011 1:02PM"

Who is Adam Steinburg?  More Coming Soon, have a tip? 

So many questions. Also I am getting Tips that Kenneth P. White and Marc Randazza may be Lovers, not that I have a problem with that, however it does seem a Conflict of Interest. So please email me tips on this issue as well. Oh you did know that Marc Randazza is Gay right? Sorry if I outed Him, thought you all knew.

Extortion, Fraud, Hate Crimes, Conspiracy, Collusion... and much more to be in my Criminal Complaint Against Marc Randazza and Kenneth P. White. Please eMail documents, videos, transcripts, any evidence of Criminal Activity regarding Marc Randazza and Kenneth P. White.

Friday, November 2, 2012

"Marc Randazza Continues to Deliberately LIE about Blogger Crystal Cox in the name of Free Speech."

"On Marc Randazza's blog, and featured in the Lynch Mob, you see discussion over the Stephanie DeYoung comment she posted on Marc Randazza's blog, The Legal Satyricon 

The defaming video that the Attorney Lynch Mob made about me shows a Comment Marc Randazza made in which flat out says he thought the comment was from me so he did not post it, you see that at 3:34 in their original video, a comment Stephanie DeYoung made regarding what Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Groupposted that she allegedly said, the "Internet Predator" post.

He quoted what he had been given that Stephanie DeYoung allegedly said and did not let her have a response. He says in the video about blogger Crystal Cox that he thought it was Crystal Cox herself that posted the comment so he did not let the comment through, knowing full well he had emailed Stephanie DeYoung and knew that the comment was indeed her. He has yet to allow her comment on that post defaming her and Blogger Crystal Cox.

This "Internet Predator" was a picture, assumed to be leaked to Marc Randazza by David Aman, the Plaintiff's Attorney in Obsidian V. Cox. Marc Randazza, in the name of Free Speech, being a First Amendment Attorney and All, has not allowed Stephanie Deyoung Free Speech regarding his posting what he believes to be her words regarding Blogger Crystal Cox.

Here is a video clip taken by me, Blogger Crystal Cox from the Video out there about me called "Crystal Cox Crazy Blogger", which is packed full of lies, partial quotes and bad information.

Well Anyway, Marc Randazza REFUSED to let her comment through. And then in the video above Marc Randazzaclaims he thought it was from me, Blogger Crystal Cox. Knowing full well that was in NO WAY True.

Email records show that 20 minutes after the comment was made, Marc Randazza emailed Stephanie Deyoung and knew full well that it was her. In fact Marc Randazza tried to discredit me, paint me in false light and flat out lie about me in those emails.

Here are those emails. They are in different time zones. You can see at bottom of the thread, he responds to the wordpress alert, so he knew since the MINUTE she posted it on April 4th that it was not me, yet deliberately painted me in "False Light".

Click Below For Document

Marc Randazza is committing a Hate Crime. Marc Randazza is encouraging his attorney and blogger lynch mob to deliberately paint blogger Crystal Cox in False Light, knowing full well that he had corresponded with Stephanie DeYoung. All this to provide a smoke screen to the corruption I am exposing in a $40 Million Dollar Bankruptcy. And to suppress my First Amendment Rights, to single me out, selective prosecution, and to attempt to suppress my Free Speech. 

Marc Randazza claims I have changed the tone of my "blogs" to about me instead of Exposing "Kevin", thing is I actively post on my Obsidian Finance Sucks blog and others regarding the Summit Bankrupty, and this is a flat out lie, AGAIN by Marc Randazza. I will list a few on the bottom of this post. I have not changed the "narrative". Marc Randazza is on a mission to destroy me because I bought, a Domain Name he did not approve of me buying and Marc Randazza is suppressing my Free Speech rights with flat out lies. Instead of going through WIPO, legal channels to determine who has a right to have MarcRandazza.comMarc Randazza claims the story is no longer about Kevin Padrick, well that is because Marc Randazza, David Carr, Kashmir Hill, David Aman, and the Judge himself have changed the focus from the blog post I was on trial for to an "Alleged" crime that I was not on trial for.

The Judge Did this to protect his "Cronies" in the Portland Oregon Attorney Fraternity.   

This is simply to divert the story. And to protect the Portland Oregon Elite law firms of Perkins Coie, Sussman Shank, Tonkon Torp and Miller Nash. And to protect Judge Randall Dunn and the Department of Justice Trustee Pamela Griffith. I still post on the story and roar it as loud as I can and in fact am working on a Federal RICO Complaint over it and FBI, DOJ Complaints regarding what I know in the Summit Bankruptcy. I encourage you all to investigate every detail of the Summit Bankruptcy and the Role of Kevin D. Padrick, as a Federally Appointed Trustee, who was at first hired by the Men who went bankruptcy to help them restructure debt. 4 mens entire lives, connections and families were ruined by the actions of One Man. 

These "Family Men" with kids, grand kids, lives full of people who love them and count on them, now they face decades in prison due to being set up by the LIES of ONE MAN, Kevin Padrick Hundreds of Creditors and Investors were harmed, and this case will continue to be the most Transparent Bankruptcy the world has ever seen, as vowed by those exposing the details of the Summit Bankruptcy and the story of ONE MAN, a Trustee taking control of the lives and property of hundreds of victims with no accountability or transparency. And in the meantime setting up his own clients to be indicted with his smoke and mirrors illusion.  

Kevin Padrick, of Obsidian Finance Group used his power and clout, his political connections, his money, his past connections with Steven Hedberg the attorney for the creditors, and the power and connections of Tonkon Torp Leon Simson to the Department of Justice Trustee Pamela Griffith, in order to get a powerful position in charge of $40 Million Dollars and a paycheck that last I looked in, was still coming. 

As of January 2012, the Summit Bankruptcy was still open and the Paycheck of Saint Kevin Padrick was still rolling in.  I still have tons of blogs regarding the Summit Bankruptcy, I still reject the Offers of Obsidian Finance Group via their Attorney involved in the Summit Scandal, and I state in every interview that the outcome I want is justice for the victims of cases I write about, such as Summit, iViewit, Lightsquared, the Petters Bankruptcy, Montana Corruption and hundreds more. 

I want to Sue Marc Randazza, if you will represent me on contingency, email me or Here is Stephanie Deyoung's Blog Detailing the Summit Bankruptcy I am also working on a book, with an ISBN to discuss all that happened with Obsidian Finance Group and the Summit Bankruptcy.  And Tons more on this Story...

All this HATE, and Lies, to distract from the 
Corruption I am Exposing in the U.S. Judicial System.

Follow the money, to not be distracted from the story by the LIES about the Messenger. Crystal Cox Blogger Industry Whistleblower

Originally Posted At

Thursday, November 1, 2012

Latest Victim of Copyright Troll Marc Randazza and the Kenneth White Lynch Mob. Expose Marc Randazza. Sue Marc Randazza. Fight Back against Extortionist, Copyright Troll Marc Randazza who uses Brown White Newhouse Kenneth P. White and a Gang of Bloggers to Attack Innocent Victims.

Copyright Troll Marc Randazza Attacks Again. Expose Marc Randazza

"Abbreviated Statement About Marco Randazza, Known Copyright Troll

1. Marco Randazza’s claims are false. He has a history of lying, contradicting himself and attempting to extort money via copyright trolling. Visit for information about his ‘legacy’. He has also in the past attempted to extort Crystal Cox, a self-identified lesbian blogger as well as numerous others. I am in the process of adding people to my legal team who can hardly wait for a rematch with Mr. Randazza. This includes numerous attorneys and co-claimants.
2. I have never scammed or ripped anyone off, nor done anything illegal, nor engaged in anything questionable. If you read Marco’s blog, he admits that he’s just doing this for fun. Furthermore, I’m not the Takedown Lawyer, Takedowm Hammer, David Blade, or anything else and neither is Chance.
3. He offered us $2,500 for this website. I told him that his offer was way too low, especially in the wake of all of the attention we’re getting courtesy of the lies of Mr. Randazza. In the event that we were offered a fair deal, I would take it – but not a bad deal, sorry. P.S. Mr. Randazza makes upwards of $550/hour and his retainer fee is $25,000. That would make his annual income for 100 clients at least 2.5 million. $$$$$$$$$. I threw in the $$$$$$’s for fun.
4. Everyone pictured on this website consented to appear on here. Anything else is total nonsense. They took the pictures themselves. They transmitted them via Fair Use. The submitters agreed to the terms of submission prior to sending them.
5. Mr. Randazza claims to be a defender of free speech – and yet he’s trying to close our website down. What a joke!
6. That picture of me you’re using really IS old as hell. I was 19 when it was taken. I don’t look like that at all anymore.
7. I earn a modest living. I give all of my earnings to my family and to Chance, except for maintenance expenses for this website. Furthermore, I really hate this job and I do not do it for revenge, to hurt people, etc., I do it because Barack Obama is the second worst President in US history (second only to Jimmy Carter). The job market is really screwed up. A talented guy like me is easily worth seven figures or more in a good economy (if Randazza’s worth $2.5 million, I’m worth at least $8 million).
8. The copycat versions of our domain and are owned by Eric S. Chanson. You know what the irony of the situation is? Mr. Randazza claimed at one point that he would help us join the lawsuit against Eric S. Chanson which is currently being pursued by Bullyville and James McGibney. He then changed his mind and claimed that he ‘never offered to represent us’ at McGibney’s behest.
9. I love all of the comments that say ‘they’re the best!’ or ‘they’re the worst!. It feels good to be polarizing as a public figure. You love me or you hate me. You love Chance, or you hate him. Do you know what I’d be doing with my life if it wasn’t for this website? Nothing. Zilch. Zero. Back against the wall, going to interview after interview and being rejected like every other honest, hard-working American.
10. From now on I’ll be posting the contact info of the people who have contacted me and tried to troll me so far. Randazza and his buddies want to do it, and they think they’ll have some mass of claimants – they’re wrong. Randazza + Steinbaugh + Popehat + Whoever else you get = It doesn’t matter. You guys can team up and call yourselves WRONGHAVEN. It would be a fitting name for you trolls.
11. Again, thank you for all the attention. A lot of people who come here are actually becoming FANS of our work, which means your behavior is actually counter-productive. The Streisand Effect.
12. First of all, anyone who wants to love, hate, etc. me, contact me at
And now, here’s a list of the trolls email accounts. Remember, these people all want to stop us from giving you content! Ken Popehat Some idiot named “Mike” Adam Steinbaugh Marco/Marc John Randazza (POLO!), aka MARCO POLO Carlos Miller who runs a supposedly pro-photography website (but doesn’t support our PHOTOGRAPHY WEBSITE. facepalm.jpg)
Make sure you send these guys a few emails and let them know what’s up. IAD FOR LIFE."
Source of Copyrights Troll Marc Randazza, Kenneth P. White, Brown White Newhouse Post

Wednesday, October 17, 2012

Hey Randazza Legal Group and the Legal Satyricon Blog Authors. YOU may Want to File an Amicus Brief in Support of MY Position in the Obsidian v. Cox Appeal. Or at Least in Support of the First Amendment, supporting neither side. Grow a Set Boys.

Why is Marc Randazza, so Called First Amendment Advocate, Standing By watching the Obsidian Vs. Cox Case Play out and DOING NOTHING to Support YOUR First Amendment Rights?

The Obsidian Finance Group LLC v. Blogger Crystal Cox is The Biggest Court Case Ever Facing the issue of the rights of New Media Bloggers and First Amendment Rights Online.

Randazza Legal Group, Marc Randazza of the Blog "Legal Satyricon" is letting this happen because he is "Butthurt" that a Blogger Smarter than his Dumb Ass, Registered the Domain Name and so, Marc Randazza is making all of you bloggers Collateral Damage in his WAR with Blogger Crystal Cox.

All of you rabid bloggers in the PopeHate Kenneth White and Marc Randazza Lynch Mob Defaming Blogger Crystal Cox, who is really fighting corruption and trying to make the world a better place, well you need this Verdict overturned, yet you do NOTHING.

Marc Randazza is NOT standing up for the First Amendment Rights of blogs such as, Philly Law Blog, Randazza's Own Legal Satyricon Blog, Kashmir Hill of Forbes, NPR's Hate against Crystal Cox, Damian Penny Blog, Newspaper Death Watch Blog, Richard Demanuel Blog, SaltyDroid, Siouxsie Law Blog and Thousands more Just Like It.

The Blog by Attorney Kenneth White and Marc Randazza's Lynch Mob, and all those connected Blog Networks, tends to trash talk people regularly, they even threaten knee caps, post what kind of car women in the porn industry drive to threaten them, they stalk and harass these people and use the search engines to ruin the lives of those who will not do as they wish.  You folks certainly are going to NEED Obsidian V. Cox overturned or GUESS WHAT Dumbshits, you're Next.

So why is, Idle, Coward Attorney Marc Randazza NOT Standing in Support of the Crystal Cox side of the Obsidian V. Cox Case?  Is this standoff really in the best interest of Bloggers, of New Media and of First Amendment Rights?

Alleged First Amendment Attorney Marc Randazza is NOT Standing in Support of First Amendment Rights for ALL Bloggers and New Media and in essence the entire Porn Industry Online. Marc Randazza is making ALL of YOU the Collateral Damage of his Petty Dick Swinging Contest with Lesbian Blogger Crystal Cox (not my porn name).

Attention Marc Randazza and your Army of THUGS;  I am a Mama Grizzly Bear, The victims of corruption are my cubs. YOU will NOT scare me, nor run me off and if you harm me or kill me, I will only get stronger in the search engines of New MEDIA. Power to the People, by the Power of Internet Marketing and the BLOGS that Expose Evil, WITHOUT THE PERMISSION of Corporate and Corruption Sponsored "Big Media" aKa Traditional Media. 

You will all have to Live with this Precedence, and it will FOREVER be NOTED that Marc Randazza is NO Supporter of Free Speech. It will be Eternally Memoralized, that when self proclaimed First Amendment Attorney Marc Randazza had his big chance back in 2012 to make a Stand for your First Amendment Rights in New Media. Marc Randazza sat back and simply made a mess of it because he got his feelings hurt by the big bad blogger Batshit Crazy Crystal Cox.

Marc Randazza is allegedly world renowned for First Amendment Rights, and protecting bloggers, websites, media companies, porn companies, Rush Limbaugh and more from frivolous legal action and First Amendment Rights Violations. Yet, because Marc Randazza is throwing a whiny fit, mad at this female blogger, he DOES nothing to protect your RIGHTS, though he has the power to do so.

Marc Randazza should file an Amicus Brief In Support of the Issues. Marc Randazza should support bloggers rights in one of his famous CNN or Fox News Yammer Sessions. But instead BUTTHURT Rabid Randazza let's ALL of YOU lose your First Amendment Rights, and he puts in no effort to support the First Amendment. All because he is BUTTHURT.

Guess What Guys, Retraction Laws Do NOT even Apply To You. You Can be Sued for 10 Million Dollars and the Plaintiff does not even have to ask you to remove a post or tell you its not factual. 

And Remember Extortion was NOT part of the Obsidian V. Cox Case (Use your Brain and your Reading Skills). Crystal Cox was not Charged with, nor On Trial for, Extortion.  It is Smoke and Mirrors that Marc Randazza and the Plaintiff in Obsidian v. Cox put up, in order to protect Portland Oregon Corruption, oh and seek revenge for being smarter than Marc Randazza.

Real First Amendment Rights Advocates are Speaking Up. 

Check Out this Amicus Brief from Submits Amicus Brief in Obsidian Vs. Cox Appeal Supporting No Party and In Support of the Issue At Stake for All Bloggers, Citizen Journalists and New Media Blogs., Thomas Goldstein Files Motion for Leave to File an Amicus Brief in the Obsidian Finance Group, LLC et al., v. Crystal Cox Appeal.  Thomas C. Goldstein submits this Amicus Brief Supporting No Party and In Support of the Issue At Stake for All Bloggers, Citizen Journalists and New Media Blogs., Thomas C. Goldstein Says,  "As a "blog" that provides a useful public service to several million readers each year, but is nonetheless unable to satisfy most of the criteria for "media" indentified by the district court in this case, the blog has an interest in the this case because of the prospect that it too would be unable to avail itself of the protections prrovided by the First Amendment and could face potential liability in a lawsuit for libel or defamation."

Read the Full, Thomas C. Goldstein Amicus Brief Below Amicus Brief Regarding Obsidian Vs. Cox Appeal

Check Out this Amicus Brief from

Obsidian Finance Group LLC v. Cox Ninth Circuit Appeal: Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press Amicus Brief.

Anti-Corruption Blogger Crystal Cox Sued for Defamation. 

Portland Oregon Federal Judge Says Bloggers are Not Journalists and BLOGS are Not Media. Blogger Denied the Protection of the First Amendment, Shield Laws, Anti-Slapp Laws and Retraction Laws. Thereby Protecting conflicts of interest and corruption among Portland Oregon's Top Law Firms, Attorney and Judges.

the Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press Amicus Brief

Of Course there is the First Amendment Rights Super Star Attorney Eugene Volokh who is actually making a difference in the First Amendment Rights of All. 

Here is the Obsidian Vs. Cox Appeal Opening Brief.

  Eugene Volokh, Crystal L. Cox Appeal. Obsidian Vs. Cox Appeal Opening Brief

more on the Obsidian Finance Group V. Crystal L. Cox Case

Wednesday, October 10, 2012

"Is Porn Valley’s Freedom of Speech Attorney, Marc Randazza, Employing a J. Malcolm DeVoy Who May Be Assisting Cyber Stalkers & Bullies in Defaming Professionals, Bloggers and Activists?"

"Monica Foster special edition post:

Marc Randazza – Photo by Ron Coleman – License: Free to copy, distribute & transmit the work as stated by - click for details
Crystal Cox Investigative Blogger – (she doesn’t threaten me with a DCMA if I post her photo like the person in the photo above)
Wednesday, April 11, 2012
Marc Randazza, an attorney who specializes in freedom of speech law and porn industry law (who has clients such as, BangBrothers, Reality Kings & Above The Law) recently went on mainstream media record stating that he and his family are being harassed and extorted by Investigative Blogger Crystal L. Cox
Randazza claims that Cox has “attacked” his 3 year old daughter via taking control of her “digital footprint” by registering her name as a .com domain name. It appears however (via my investigation and research into the attacks upon myself, family members and other porn industry acquaintances by individuals both in and attached to the porn industry beginning 2010) that Marc Randazza in fact does employ and work closely with a man by the name of James (Jay) Malcolm DeVoy who appears to regularly communicate with and assist (and who may have been hired or retained by) stalkers and cyber bullies within and attached to the Los Angeles porn industry – who take part in equivalent (and in many cases far worse) activity to Crystal L. Cox .
Is Marc Randazza manipulating the mainstream media by exploiting a “last resort defense tactic” of Crystal Cox (of which she appeared to have acted onpost being given notice of Randazza’s deposition request) in effort to draw attention away from other notable issues & details in regards to his motives, interaction and situation with Cox?
Is Marc Randazza’s primary objective in actuality to defame, harass & bully Cox into silence in effort to prohibit her Freedom of Speech?

I personally believe, so – however I ask you the reader to examine the evidence and decide for yourself.

DeVoy advising Whiteacre in regards to
Anti-Porn activist Shelley Lubben

As I stated before, while investigating into who I’ve identified as the sources of my own harassment, stalking, cyberbulling and defamation of which myself and family members have suffered (beginning 2010), I found several public communications on Twitter between my stalkers and someone with the screen name JmDiv

The blog address: was listed on the JmDivtwitter profile so I took a look at it. It didn’t take long for me to realize that this man was employed by Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group.

After a quick skim of the employee (team) roster of I came to learn that JmDiV on twitter is J. (James / Jay) Malcolm DeVoy – an attorney licensed in Nevada and Wisconsin.
I remembered I’d recently read a news story and watched a video in regards to Marc Randazza and his family allegedly being harassed by a blogger, so initially I found it hard to believe that the Randazza Legal Group would employ someone who appears to be friendly with, of assistance to and who may even possibly have been hired or retained by people well known in the porn industry as harassers and stalkers – one of which being Michael Whiteacre, a man who has been clearly defined as a stalker of Anti-Porn Activist Shelley Lubben by the well respected blogger, speaker and long time porn professional Mike South of
James DeVoy assisting Whiteacre legally on Shelley Lubben

Devoy appears to be very supportive of (and frequently assistance to) Michael Whiteacre (a man who has affiliations with the Free Speech Coalition and the Los Angeles porn industry).  
Whiteacre frequently defames online and has stalked offline Anti Porn Activist Shelley Lubben and her family (of which includes 2 little girls), and has gone as far as to created an unauthorized defamatory & humiliating documentary about her.

Randazza employee J. DeVoy referring to Michael Whiteacre’s
targets as “charlatans”
Whiteacre in the past has repeatedly suggested that I (and his other targets) commit suicide - please click here to read a post I’ve written about this. I personally feel that Whiteacre’s and his associate’s obsessive stalking, harassment, cyber bullying and defamation is specifically intended to coerce their targets into suicide.
Is DeVoy, a Marc Randazza employee, involved in Whiteacre’s actions against his targets? It appears so in my opinion.
DeVoy doesn’t only enjoy Whiteacre’s work, he follows my
& my family’s stalker Sean Tompkin’s defamitory blog too.
Sean Tompkins has stated on many occasions on his blogs, website and in interviews that he was instrumental and the forum being taken offline. However there has never been legal closure to the situation. 
Sean Tompkins defaming my sister who has never had even
a remote link to adult entertainment or prostitution. He has
referenced her name on his website along with her photograph.
After the Pornwikileaks forum was taken offline, Sean Tompkins asked on several occasions for me to meet and spend time with him. My refusal of this made him angry, as did my questioning of Tompkin’s financial motive and gain in regards to the “behind the scenes deals” which led to the Pornwikileaks forum being taken offline. Tompkins on his site began to aggressively slander, defame, stalk, harass, cyberbully and threaten myself and family – in the exact same fashion as those who supposedly ran PornWikileaks.

Furthermore Sean Tompkins went on a crusade claiming that I was a primary poster on the PornWikiLeaks website. He has gone as far as to fabricate supposed posts I made on the site claiming that the listed IP address is the proof. Being that Tompkins supposedly has the IP address of every poster of the site, yet has never come forward with exactly who created the defamatory individual wiki pages and entries of my parents, sister and many others, so that they can take legal action, tell me that Tompkins is hiding something or protecting someone (possibly himself) – which in my view tells me he lacks credibility entirely.

Michael Whiteacre and Sean Tompkins
harassing me directly on twitter.

Tompkins has noted publicly that he wants to sue me, and has inferred that he has an attorney in the Las Vegas area (which ironically is where Randazza and DeVoy are located). Is J. DeVoy his attorney? If so I feel he would have a conflict of interest considering his frequent communications and possibly offline professional relationship and/or friendship with Michael Fattorosi (known as PornLaw on twitter) – who is another porn industry attorney ( and friendly competitor of Marc Randazza.

Michael Fattorosi allegedly advised the man who initiated the PornWikiLeaks project (Donald Carlos Seoane aka Donny Long) and Mike South of has posted emails which were obtained that verify the allegations.

Through alleged “behind the scenes deals” with Donny Long (and/or other operators of the PornWikiLeaks website), Fattorosi supposedly was able to get certain people’s information removed from the forum database. A couple of those people appeared to be pornstar Vanessa Blue & porn director Will Ryder – however there were several others.
Sean Tompkins tweeting constantly in regards to
Monica Foster (me) and calling for my physical harm.
Michael Fattorosi at one point was involved in a company called 2257safe (which later was re-branded 2257snap) of which advertised itself a record keeping service for both large and small porn studios. Through email communication with Fattorosi’s ex partner in the venture (who contacted me in effort to tell his side of the situation) I learned that Fattorosi allegedly left his partner in debt.  Furthermore, though Pornwikileaks was said to have attained the porn performer’s 2257 data and personal info from AIM, it could have partially been from the 2257safe database as well being Fattorosi may have had a copy of the database being that he was partner in the venture.

James DeVoy’s communication, professional relationship with Fattorosi puzzles me, considering the well documented history of Fattorosi’s involvement in the PornWikiLeaks issue of which I’d assume he’d be well aware of being involved in porn industry law. If the majority of DeVoy’s public twitter communications were only prior to June 27, 2011 – I’d say that DeVoy simply wasn’t aware of the situation.  However much of DeVoy’s public communication with Fattorosi is well after that date – which was the date of which made Fattorosi’s alleged advisement of PornWikiLeaks public.

Is James Malcolm Devoy, a porn industry attorney, supportive of a website which released the personal information of thousands of porn performers? Is Devoy supportive of websites which harass, defame, stalk & cyberbully pornstars? Does DeVoy, a Marc Randazza employee, think that endangering the privacy and lives of  people for no justifiable reason, who have no attachment to adult or mainstream entertainment who are not public figures and who have children is OK?

James Malcolm DeVoy tweeting with someone
obviously impersonating me and using a photo
of which I own the rights to.
It appears to be so in my opinion.
At this stage, I feel that the Randazza Legal Group may be directly involved with and partially responsible for much of the suffering I, my family members, Anti-Porn activist Shelley Lubben and even porn industry professionals such as award winning director Nica Noelle (who has been viciously targeted by Whiteacre) have been forced to endure.
Through my email communication with Randazza, he explained that DeVoy’s assistance is just that of a “young kid”.
James Malcolm DeVoy in my view is NOT a “kid” however. DeVoy is a university educated adult who maintains a professional job as an attorney, who in my view should be able to conduct himself professionally, and be well versed as to the very recent porn industry related events (Pornwikileaks had mainstream media coverage) of which Michael Fattorosi, Michael Whiteacre and Sean Tompkins were involved in. I view Marc Randazza’s excuse for Devoy as not only weak, but disrespectful to all who have been unjustifiably targeted by online (or offline) stalking, cyberbullying and harassment.
James DeVoy and Michael Fattorosi communicating
prior to the revelation of  Fattorosi’s alleged involvement
I have to question, being many of DeVoy’s communications appear to be during typical business hours:  Is he being paid by Randazza (or another party) to assist stalkers Whiteacre and Tompkins?  Is there a private business relationship between Fattorosi and the Randazza Legal Group?

Considering that the forum initially was attached to the URL I wouldn’t be surprised. Much of the “philosophy” behind the Pornwikileaks project was that it fell under the legality of “parody” – which is a legal term Randazza is very familiar with being that he worked on the Beck vs. Eiland-Hall case of which the domain was the issue (Randazza represented Eiland and won the case AGAINST Glenn Beck).

Devoy & Fattorosi making plans to meet
Is Marc Randazza a hypocrite? From my perspective, yes. Is Marc Randazza dismissive? In my opinion absolutely. According to his email communications with me, none of the information I presented him with (much of which is a part of this blog posting) is a big deal and he went as far as to call my concerns “silly”.
Is Randazza manipulating the media to gain sympathy to deter attention from other matters, issues and affiliations of which he may not want attention brought to? I think it’s very possible considering the actions of his employee along with his employee’s affiliations.
Marc Randazza did offer to grant me an interview with him, but truthfully, considering that I don’t know nature of his relationships with his employees or with my stalkers, I’m deathly afraid of him. I am deathly afraid to be within physical proximity of all of the individuals I’ve noted James DeVoy communicating with for that matter – Sean Tompkins, Michael Whiteacre and Michael Fattorosi considering the continued harassment and threats on my life I receive from Tompkins and Whiteacre to this day.

Post Fattorosi’s alleged involvement in
PornWikiLeaks being made public, DeVoy
still communicates with Fattorosi. It
appears Randazza does as well considering
the last tweet captured here.

In part 2 of this article of which I will post this weekend, I will explore a bit further into some questionable affiliations of James DeVoy I was able to find which I feel need to be addressed being that he’s an employee of Marc Randazza yet appears to communicate regularly with known stalkers.
I will also present some information in regards to the interaction between Marc Randazza and Crystal L. Cox and explain some connections to the porn industry in regards to the issue Cox was seeking legal representation for.
I feel there is a possible conflict of interest as for Randazza to have represented her, and I believe it may have been detrimental to her case for him to have represented her…please check back this weekend to find out why.

Source of Post