Friday, May 20, 2016

WIPO is NOT Neutral. WIPO is Corruptible. WIPO favors Trademark Lawyers and their Cronies. Investigate WIPO and Demand Accountability and Transparency.

For years we have seen repeated "calls for the official publication of independent investigations into claims made about the conduct of WIPO" and now maybe WIPO is actually being investigated. START with Peter Michaelson, Francis Gurry, and their connections and conspiracy with INTA and Trademark Attorney favoritism.

WIPO IS Very VERY Corrupt. It is about time that someone is paying attention.

WIPO has been acting in collusion with Trademark Attorneys such as Marc Randazza and Peter Michaelson for a VERY long time.

WIPO does not act independent nor fair and they simply STEAL intellectual property and give to whoever can do the most for them or they are acting in conspiracy with.

I have an email that Francis Gurry copied Steven Rodgers Vice President & Deputy General Counsel at Intel Corporation , WIPO works in conspiracy with corporations such as INTEL and against the rights of Citizens, Inventors and Intellectual property owners.

"Congress sets sights on WIPO over whistleblower allegations"

"In a hearing held yesterday afternoon by several sub-committees of the US Congress, a series of allegations about WIPO accountability and the mistreatment of staff and whistleblowers by Director General Francis Gurry were dramatically laid bare. At the heart of the discussion is a still-unpublished United Nations Office of Internal Oversight Services (OIOS) report into accusations levelled at Gurry.

On World Trademark Review we have previously reported on calls for the official publication of independent investigations into claims made about the conduct of WIPO’s current leader.

In April 2014, James Pooley, previously a deputy director general of the UN body, alleged that Gurry had violated the human rights of WIPO employees whose DNA is said to have been collected without their permission and of suppressing evidence that this had occurred.

He also alleged that Gurry improperly used his influence in a procurement procedure to benefit an Australian acquaintance. Just under a year ago, when we last reported on the allegations, there had been seemingly not been an official and independent investigation of the allegations. Fast forward 12 months and the momentum is building."

Source and Full Article

Also Check Out

Don't Forget to investigate the INTA, and the Trademark attorneys like Marc Randazza and Peter Michaelson that have conflicts of interest and act in collusion to ruin reputations, steal search engine placement, steal intellectual property and affect court cases and precedent. 

Investigative Blogger Crystal Cox tried to SUE WIPO. Crystal Cox informed authorities over and over, informed Godaddy, attorneys, Trademark authorities, the DOJ, the FBI, and multiple courts. They did NOTHING. The COURTS have known for a long time and looked the other way.

Here is some case filings;

Cox v. WIPO

Crystal L. Cox vs. Godaddy, WIPO Court Complaint

WIPO named in RICO complaint, page 60-80 approx.

WIPO SEC Complaint, iViewit

WIPO and iViewit

iViewit Patent Information

Many other State Courts and Authorities were noticed as well. So was German Courts. They ALL ignored the collusion time and time again.


Immunity of International Organizations

Check out page 134 on this document / book - WIPO is Immune, Check out the Whole Book .

Why is this ASSHOLE still an attorney? Can't Judges, Attorney General's, Detectives, the DOJ, or any authority READ. Marc Randazza has CLEARLY violated the rights of client after client. He defends pedophiles, and should be indicted as far as I see it. Yet he is still YAPPING as if what he says has ANY credibility.

" Feldman regrets “demonstrating a lack of impulse control” in sending the email."


Oh ya Marc Randazza clients can email whatever they want. But if Crystal Cox emails an attorney, acting as her own attorney, in a PRIVATE CONFIDENTIAL settlement agreement, then that is EXTORTION and Marc Randazza shouts from every rooftop and in every big media that will listen that she is an Extortionist. And he published my private email in mass, knowing it was being painted in false light as he had acted as my attorney. That private email was made to be EVIL and Randazza can ruin lives, flat out lie about whoever he wants, threaten people and say whatever LIE he wants and that is ok, legal and ethical??

But oh yeah my client is abusive, and an asshole like me but he is sorry, so sorry.

FUCK You Marc Randazza. IT IS NOT ok for you to RUIN LIVES with your LIES. Why do you still have a license to represent clients?? WOW.

"Attorney admits emails to female city councilmembers were 'abusive,' apologizes"

"“He has come to realize that his reactions, and the communications he sent, were over the top, and that his tendency to this kind of behavior is a long-standing problem,” said Marc J. Randazza, a First Amendment attorney who represents Jason M. Feldman, in a statement. “He unequivocally apologizes to the recipients of his abusive comments.”

Source of this Marc Randazza, Hyprocrite ASSHOLE Attorney quote

"“As women, I understand that you spend a lot of your time trying to please others (mostly on your knees) but I can only hope that you each find ways to quickly and painfully end yourselves,” the email said. “Each of you should rot in hell for what you took from me yesterday.”

Randazza – who last week suggested the councilmembers should do “what an adult would do” and shrug it off – said Feldman is seeking help from mental health professionals.

“This event has forced him to confront his impulse control issues,” the statement said. “After consulting with professionals, friends, and family, he recognizes that he has a problem and that that problem has hurt other people – not just in this circumstance, but in multiple occasions in the past.”


Fucktard Hypocritical Mean, Evil Marc Randazza says do what an adult should do and shrug it off???   WOW WTF?   Marc Randazza ruined massive lives, sued so many people, threatened us, ruined our lives or relationships or reputations, harassed us, attacked us, demeaned us, exposed our private lives, gave out our home address and more private information, stole massive intellectual property, incited massive hate against us, and all we did was call his wife a slut and make fun of him, and buy a few domain names. WHY DIDN'T Marc Randazza JUST ACT LIKE AN ADULT AND SHRUG IT OFF?

Wednesday, May 11, 2016

"Mr. Randazza permitted and encouraged his children to have warm personal relationships with Mr. Gideon, who they called "Uncle."

Marc Randazza put's on a great act that he has concern for his children and who has access to them, yet this court ruling sure paints Marc Randazza as someone who is not acting very "fatherly" in an ethical manner as far as I see it. Uncle Gideon.

"Prior to and subsequent to agreeing to go "in house" as E/L's general counsel, Mr. Randazza was outside counsel to several companies engaged in Internet pornography, including videos and stills available on openly homosexual websites.

Since at least the date of the commencement of his employment as E/L's inside general counsel through his last day of E/L employment, Mr. Randazza knew of and was not in any way uncomfortable with Mr. Gideon's gay sexual orientation --- which was also that of most, but not all, of E/L's other executives --- and the frequent seasoning of business and socially- related conversation and written communications with crude gay and other sexual terms, references and allusions, which Mr. Randazza also used.

Mr. Randazza was not embarrassed to be seen or filmed in full undress at a poolside business-social event at Mr. Gideon's home. Mr. Randazza permitted and encouraged his children to have warm personal relationships with Mr. Gideon, who they called "Uncle."

L.  The evidence was that the only complaints which Mr. Randazza had concerning the pornographic filming in his offices in April 2012 --- four months before the end of his employment--- were that (1) he was not given the courtesy of advance notice of the shoot and (2) after the shoot was completed, Mr. Randazza's office was not restored to just the way it had been before the office was prepped for filming.

The preponderance of disputed evidence was not that Mr. Randazza complained to Mr. Gideon centering on or in any way reasonably relating to sexual discrimination or harassment or a hostile work environment based on sex, including "male-on-male" sex, which has been recognized as a basis
for a legal claim.

Accordingly, allegedly involuntary termination of Mr. Randazza's employment, based on Mr. Randazza's April 2012 complaint about the filming of pornography in his office --- which did not constitute statutorily "protected activity" --- is not includible as a component for a statutory claim that he had been fired in retaliation for making that complaint.

Mr. Randazza's complaint about the allegedly personally offensive oral copulation of Mr. Gideon in the back seat of his car on August 9, 2012 was not genuinely or deeply felt and was made primarily for tactical reasons. Therefore, the end of Mr. Randazza's employment was not and was not the product of anything retaliatory, in violation of public policy (e.g., engaging in protected activity), as a matter of law."

Source and Full Document

Successfully concluded negotiations for a BRIBE to be paid to Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group.

"The precipitating events which led to the end of Mr. Randazza's employment was Mr. Gideon's having first learned on August 13, 2012 that Mr. Randazza had been involved in and successfully concluded negotiations for a bribe in the amount of $75,000, to be paid to Mr. Randazza by the other side in connection with resolution of high-importance litigation, commonly referred to as the "Oron litigation," which had been initiated and pursued on behalf of E/L by Mr. Randazza, as E/L's counsel of record."

"1. A sudden and significant reduction of those previously primarily electronic (i.e., email and text) communications --- beginning only after Mr. Gideon learned of the $75,000 bribe --- with Mr. Randazza sending Mr. Gideon unresponded-to emails attempting to attempting to salvage and revive his communications and relationship

2. Mr. Randazza beat a hasty retreat, in an attempt to salvage the situation by offering to pay the bribe money over to E/L, when initially confronted by Mr. Gideon concerning the bribe provision in the Oron settlement agreement, presented for Mr. Gideon."

"The Arbitrator has determined, based on the evidence, that Mr. Randazza solicited the bribe in the first instance, attempted to negotiate with Oron's counsel ways and means whereby it would be concealed from and not become known by E/L, and disclosed it to E/L, per Mr. Gideon, for the first time only on August 13, 2012, when the settlement documentation prepared and presented for Mr. Gideon's signature on behalf of E/L by Oron's counsel surfaced a $75,000 retainer payment to Mr. Randazza.

The Arbitrator has further determined that E/L never gave Mr. Randazza permission or consent to solicit, negotiate or accept the $75,000 bribe,* or any bribe or any other payment other than payment of all proceeds being solely for deposited to the account of his clients/principals, E/L."

Source and Full Document / Cour Motion;
Marc Randazza took a Bribe, why is he still practicing law?